WebMay 30, 2024 · In the Eturas case, many Lithuanian travel agencies or spokes used a common platform or hub (“Eturas”) for limiting the possibility of applying discounts of more than 3%, which was likely to have an anticompetitive effect. On the other hand, Eturas acted as a facilitator by circulating the travel agencies’ discount cap message. WebMar 20, 2016 · Court of Justice rules on the evidence needed to show a 'concerted practice' in the context of online platforms: Eturas and al v Lietuvos Respublikos konkurencijos taryba, case C-74/14, judgment of 21 January 2016 The Court of Justice (the Court) ruled on 21 January 2016 on a request for a preliminary ruling from the Lithuanian …
The Eturas case - Competition Law Insight
WebMar 16, 2024 · In his opinion to Eturas case, AG Szpunar proposed the test of assessing whether an anticompetitive practice of competitors (in our case—Uber drivers) and a facilitator of their conduct (in our case—Uber) should be regarded as a horizontal or vertical agreement. 178 He clarified that, hypothetically, if an online booking company restricts ... WebDec 31, 2016 · The Eturas case highlights a hazard of managing cooperation through an online platform and demonstrates that such platforms can facilitate unlawful … hines service center
EUR-Lex - 62014CJ0074 - EN - EUR-Lex
Web1 day ago · The surprise evidence and sanction come days before the trial is scheduled to begin in the $1.6 billion defamation case Dominion Voting Systems filed against Fox … WebEturas and Others v Lietuvos Respublikos konkurencijos taryba Policy area Competition Justice, freedom and security Deciding body type Court of Justice of the European Union … WebE-TURAS, the platform at issue, enables travel agencies that acquired an operating licence for its use to offer travel bookings for sale on their websites through a … hines security